Quantcast Alienation of Park Land Continues with Development on Randall’s Island - New York Latino Journal
Masthead..top_right
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Alienation of Park Land Continues with Development on Randall’s Island PDF Print E-mail
MARINA ORTIZ   
Saturday, December 16, 2006


Image
LAST INNING FOR PUBLIC PARKS ON RANDALL'S ISLAND
Manuel Torres looks to score a hit for the Spanish Harlem-based baseball team of Camaradas El Barrio. The Water Park development and privatization of dozens of baseball fields in Randall’s Island would severely curtail free access to baseball fields for surrounding communities of East Harlem and the South Bronx. Photo: Rafael Merino Cortés/ grupoHuracán


Imagelthough Commissioner Benape claims the proposed Randall’s Island Water Park will serve a “park use,” it will only do so minimally and for a cost. With this development, residents are concerned over the lost of more public parklands to privatization. In addition, the environmental concerns are being voiced just as loudly, especially when thinking of the rampant development already underway or proposed in the area, could cause a traffic and ecological nightmare.

However, there other ethical concerns regarding the proposed Water Park development.


The New York Times reported today on the alarming friendship between New York State Senate’s majority leader Joseph L. Bruno and Jared E. Abbruzzese, an investor with Empire Racing Associates, which was awarded an operating franchise for the state’s thoroughbred horseracing tracks.1

According to the Times, Abbruzzese’s nanotechnology firm, Evident Technologies, also received $500,000 in state money and had help from Bruno in obtaining $2.5 million in state aid for a joint development project.

What does any of this have to do with a Water Park on Randall’s Island?

Abbruzzese is also an investor with the Aquatic Development Group, “winners” of a sole-source bid for a 35-year Water Park concession contract in 2000, which City Comptroller William Thompson called a “seriously flawed process.”

Aquatic recently bailed out of a public hearing at the New York City Industrial Development Agency regarding $215 million bond funding. With no explanation, the company announced that it would instead seek private funding for the project.

When asked, the Randall’s Island Sports Foundation said the Aquatic Development Group withdrew its bid for Industrial Development Authority (IDA) bonds simply because it had secured private funding. When asked to name those funding sources, however, The Foundation admitted that Aquatic is still in the process of acquiring investors.

Perhaps the decision had more to do with media reports about Aquatic’s prior brush with bankruptcy in the 1990s, or the failure of its president, Herb Ellis, to repay a $1.5 million loan to the Albany IDA.

Image
BETWEEN A PARK AND A HARD PLACE
In a recent meeting held in East Harlem, Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, Councilwoman Melissa Mark Vivertio and other legislators continued their dialogue between the community and advocates in an attempt to find a middle ground regarding the Randall’s Island Water Park development. Photo: Marina Ortiz

The New York City Parks Department apparently shares the same lack of integrity. Under the leadership of Parks Commissioner Adrian Benape, thousands of acres of public land has been systematically turned over to private developers and, in many cases, permanently removed from free and open public use.

On Randall’s Island, the Water Park has grown from 12 acres to 26 acres, an area covering the entire northwestern side of the island. Construction for the site will greatly limit the number of ball fields, with the remaining fields most likely awarded to grandfathered permit holders from out-of-district private schools.

Although the Randall’s Island Sports Foundation claims that view of the river will not be blocked by the perimeter fencing or the water park (which will sit on sunken land), the developer’s description of “water slides rising 80 feet into the skyline” does not provide much reassurance. Certainly, public access to the shore will be severely hampered.

With an estimated 1.3 million visitors each year, the Water Park will greatly increase vehicular traffic to and from the island -– thus releasing billions of particles of asthma-producing gas fumes and carcinogens into the atmosphere over the island and surrounding areas.2

While the Foundation dismisses claims of environmental risk or damage as “nonsense,” it is a simple fact that that many visitors will also produce that much more pollution –- not to mention noise, crime, garbage and contaminated groundwater draining into the nearby Harlem River. Provisions to preserve tranquility in nearby parkland, meanwhile, have never been offered.

The Foundation claims the Water Park is needed to help fund island maintenance and sports activities, yet it provides no details or reports on such financing. Likewise, the Foundation does not provide financial data on concert/stadium event revenue.

Aside from the proposed 300 (presumably entry-level) jobs and a few free tickets tossed to targeted agencies under the advisement of Community Board 11, the Water Park will provide no direct and lasting financial benefit to neighboring communities.

Clearly, we cannot support a Water Park on Randall’s Island.

We should oppose what Comptroller Thompson called "a process that is flawed and inconsistent with well-established principles of public bidding." This plan defies sound environmental and fiscal logic. While it may generate millions of dollars each year for its developers and investors, it will have little benefit to the East Harlem community. Most importantly, we should not bargain with the little public parkland we have left without due process.


1 -- “Ties Run Deep Between Bruno and an Investor” by MIKE McINTIRE, published on December 16, 2006 in The New York Times.

2 -- This potential health concern would be atop of the conditions already causing an alarming rate of asthma cases in East Harlem (Read “Asthma, Poverty and Pollution” by Natalie Olivero, September, 2006, Gotham Gazette
). The Water Park project would begin construction around the time the mega-outlet development of East River Plaza on 116 Street near the F.D.R. Drive is mid-way or finishing construction. Also, the proposed residential and commercial project formally known as “Uptown NY” (from 125 Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenues to 127 Street) would also be under construction around the same time. The Department of Motor Vehicles has yet to release an estimate of how much traffic would increase in the East Harlem area once the Water Park, East River Plaza and the 125 Street Development are in operation. It is safe to assume there will not be a decrease in traffic.





MARINA ORTIZ heads East Harlem Preservation

 

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!



Tag Cloud

according   america   american   baseball   border   bush   chávez   community   cuba   cuban   cultural   economic   government   immigrant   immigrants   immigration   international   latin   latino   mexican   mexico   national   photo   police   political   president   public   puerto   rican   ricans   rico   rights   social   software   spanish   states   united   venezuela   venezuelan   washington   york  

Created with AkoCloud 1.1 final.
Announcements
AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement




Main Menu
Main
About NYLJ
Search
Events Calendar
Booklist
Contact Us
Sections
News
Politics
Culture & Education
Arts
History
Eagles in Fall, Lions in Spring
Boricua Nation
Business & Economics
Theology
User Menu
Bookmark It!
Events Calendar
March 2012 April 2012 May 2012
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Random Picture (minical_pic1.jpg)
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Latest Events
There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View Full Calendar
Login
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?





New York Latino Journal, NYLatinoJournal.com and the red box with 'ny' device followed by the 'LATINO JOURNAL' text are service marks of grupoHuracan. All content is copyright 2005-2008 grupoHuracan or respective authors.

The New York Latino Journal is not responsible for content from external sites. The comments and opinions throughout this publication belong to their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Latino Journal publication, grupoHuracan or any of their affiliates and/or partners. GrupoHuracan provides technical and marketing support to the New York Latino Journal and is not involved in its editorial process.

The New York Latino Journal is a non-profit venture. Please contact: info(at)nylatinojournal.com for any questions, comments, sponsor inquiries, or story submissions.



Powered by
Best viewed with